Biotechnologies for smallholders: new publications

i3403e00The UN Food and Agriculture Organisation recently released a new publication, Biotechnologies at Work for Smallholders: Case Studies from Developing Countries in Crops, Livestock and Fish, which details how biotechnologies can help smallholders improve their livelihoods and food security. The report urges governments and stakeholders to take greater steps to bring agricultural biotechnologies to smallholder producers in developing countries.

Through 19 case studies in crops, livestock and fisheries, authors explore real experiences of smallholders using biotechnology in the production of a variety of crops, for example, bananas, cassava, rice, livestock and shrimp. The cases also cover a range of biotechnologies such as artificial insemination, fermentation and more sophisticated DNA-based methodologies, although not genetic modification.

The case studies have been selected from India, China, Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon, Colombia, Cuba, Ghana, Nigeria, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tanzania and Thailand. In India, as an example, DNA markers have been used to develop a flood-tolerant rice variety with a potential yield increase of 1 to 3 tons per hectare compared to other varieties, under flood conditions. As of 2012, the new variety, Swarna-Sub1, was being used by three million farmers.

In Cameroon, DNA-based diagnostic tools have allowed for the quick detection and diagnosis of Peste des Petits Ruminants outbreaks, a virus which can rapidly spread amongst goats and sheep. This biotechnology has enabled authorities to control the disease, thus preventing an outbreak.

Biotechnologies, as seen from the case studies, can boost yields, improve quality and market opportunities, reduce costs and thus improve agricultural livelihoods for smallholders. As the report emphasises, however, biotechnologies will only work for smallholder farmers if smallholders participate in the design, research and dissemination processes.

While the case studies presented in the publication can provide guidance to policy makers in designing biotechnology-based programmes, the wider enabling environment for the introduction and adoption of such technologies also needs to be addressed, for example, long-term investment in national physical and social capacity and greater cooperation and knowledge exchange across borders.

One of the barriers to the use of biotechnology in developing countries is the transfer and adaptation of technologies from one place to another. In a policy report from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), also recently launched and entitled, Private sector agricultural technology transfer into Bangladesh, Kenya, Senegal, Tanzania, and Zambia, the process of private technology transfer and the interaction between governments and private research is examined. Based on survey data from 126 organisations, interviews and other sources, the report looks at various forms of technology being developed in private companies such as pesticides, machinery, fertilisers and hybrids. The report aims to illuminate ways in which governments and donors can utilise and promote private research and understand the factors that can hinder it.

IFPRI has also published a book entitled, Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Economic and Policy Lessons from Countries South of the Sahara, which evaluates the potential benefits, risks and impacts of GMOs in sub-Saharan Africa. Using existing studies on GM crops in terms of economics, consumer perception and trade impacts, authors conclude that, on average, GM has been largely positive for the economies of adopter countries. The book also makes suggestions for how the benefits of GM might be boosted, for example by developing biosafety regulations that do not make GM crop development “prohibitively expensive”, by developing policies to enable intraregional trade in GM crops, and by supplying concerned consumers with quality information about GM (although there is an assumption that it is a lack of data that makes consumers sceptical of GM).

Across these three publications there is a clear desire to make new technologies, whatever the source, work for developing countries in ways that contribute to poverty reduction and economic growth. A large part of the success of new technologies will be, as stated in One Billion Hungry, that they are appropriate for smallholder farmers and only smallholders know what is appropriate for them.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: